I
saw an infographic last week that caught my attention. When teachers were asked to respond to, “I
make learning exciting for my students”, 84% responded affirmatively. But when students were asked if their
teachers make learning exciting, only 40% indicated that they felt this was the
case. The disparity between the two
perspectives got me to thinking about why this is the case.
As
I look back on my K-12 days, I realize just how many differences there were
between that environment and the environment in today’s classroom. While there may have been a prescribed
curriculum to ensure that students in a particular grade were being taught
pretty much the same content, there was a great deal more autonomy on the part
of the teacher to teach the content in a manner best suited to their individual
personality and style.
The
continued focus on high stakes testing has to be a part of this gap between
student and teacher perspectives on what makes learning exciting. This is certainly no fault of today’s
teachers. They are doing a phenomenal
job of adapting to an environment where autonomy has somewhat been sucked out
of the classroom. With the focus on
testing, they are left with no choice but to adapt their style to a structure that
requires a bit more (or maybe it’s a lot more) of a structured approach. But they persevere and are generally very
successful; for that, they deserve our undying appreciation.
The
question now becomes one of better understanding why students feel that
learning is not exciting. At the core, I
have to believe that the “drill and kill” approach driven by high stakes testing
is having a major impact on their perception of what makes learning
exciting. Much like an accountability
system where the lowest performing campus dictates the overall rating for the
district, the testing requirement has an overarching impact on student
perception of the classroom environment.
Can
I absolutely state that the elimination or at least the reduction in testing
would jump the number significantly? I
certainly cannot but I firmly believe that the response percentages will be
favorably impacted. I have one other
idea of how we might better understand student perspectives. Let’s ask them! After all, the real stakeholders in the
discussion about public education are the students themselves.
Increasingly,
I see efforts on the part of leadership in districts across the state to engage
students as part of an advisory council for them and those efforts are to be
applauded. When education is a
collaborative effort between all stakeholders, “good things” happen in the
classroom. And the more that “good things”
happen, the greater the likelihood that students will begin to feel that the
classroom is more exciting.
No comments:
Post a Comment