As most of us engaged in public advocacy know, the obvious
answer to this question is no. In
general, those who operate outside of the structure of the public education
sector (as defined by being governed by locally elected trustees) are not held
to the same level of accountability.
There is a strong push (again) in the Texas Senate, led by Lt. Governor
Patrick, for vouchers that allow the transfer of public funds to private schools. Part of the argument centers around the need
to provide a path to a quality public education for students who are “trapped”
in a failing school or district and it’s tough to argue against that intent.
The problem as I see it is that these private schools, as
well as for-profit charter schools, are not held to the same level of
accountability as the schools in the more than 1,000 Texas public school
districts. So if we consider for a
moment that there is a need to allow for transfer of funds to other than public
ISD’s (I’m not saying that there is!), how do we ensure that we, as taxpayers,
are getting the return on our investment in these schools without having some
way to measure it? More importantly, how
are we focusing on the needs of the students?
Think about it for a moment.
The 84th Legislature passed a bill that will lead to
assigning an A-F grade to all schools beginning with the 2016-2017 school
year. But how do we measure that? The legislature has outlined a number of
variables but much of this evaluation hinges on STAAR results. More importantly, if we accept that a campus
level grading system is logical (again, I am not saying that it is!), how do we
know if private schools and charter schools are failing their students? Without a formal accountability system to
measure and evaluate performance, consistent with that imposed on public ISD’s,
there simply is no way to do so. Therein
lies the problem. If all schools are not
held to the same accountability standards, how can a parent make an informed
choice if they decide to look at options other than their local district?
Remember, school choice does include public schools. But in order to evaluate how well public
schools are doing as compared to other options, we have to have a clearly
defined way to determine which option is best suited for individual
students. If we don’t have those
parameters, we can have no assurance that the quality of the education in
options outside of public education is any better. Simply moving the problem won’t solve the
issue; in fact, moving the problem actually compounds the challenge of
addressing quality in our public schools.
Let’s tackle the problems together and Make Education a Priority.
No comments:
Post a Comment